AI Search Optimization: Why Generative Engine Optimization Is Reshaping Search in 2025
The 2025 search shift: from SEO to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
Generative engines—systems that answer queries by reading the web, retrieving sources, and writing a synthesized response—are now first‑class discovery channels. In 2025, “rankings” aren’t just ten blue links. They’re answer boxes with in‑line citations, expandable sections, shopping modules, and follow‑ups that behave like a researcher. Traditional SEO still matters, but the center of gravity has moved to generative engine optimization (GEO): making your content more likely to be read, cited, and quoted by AI search. (arxiv.org)
GEO began as an academic idea. In November 2023, researchers from Princeton, Stanford, and others defined “generative engines” and proposed GEO as a framework to improve publisher visibility within AI answers. Their evaluations showed that optimizing pages for machine comprehension could lift visibility in responses by up to 40%—a striking result that foreshadowed today’s shift in traffic and content design. (arxiv.org)
The commercial rollout followed quickly. Google’s AI Overviews moved beyond limited testing to more than 100 countries by October 28, 2024, with the company saying the feature reaches over a billion monthly users and is designed to show more in‑line links to sources. That design change matters for publishers: the links inside the overview are often the only way a user clicks out. (blog.google)
OpenAI pushed in the same direction. After piloting “SearchGPT” in July 2024, OpenAI folded search directly into ChatGPT and, by February 5, 2025, made ChatGPT search broadly available, emphasizing links, source transparency, and partnerships with major publishers. If you’re optimizing for “AI search,” you’re optimizing for these answer experiences across engines, not just one. (openai.com)
Perplexity, meanwhile, leaned into being an “answer engine” with aggressive citation behavior and, in February 2025, launched Deep Research—an agent-like mode that iteratively reads dozens to hundreds of sources to produce a citable report. Partnerships with newsrooms and new research modes keep raising the bar for what “a result” looks like. (techcrunch.com)
Timeline: GEO research (Nov 2023) to global AI search rollouts in 2025
- Nov 16, 2023 — GEO paper formalizes “generative engines” and visibility metrics for publishers. (arxiv.org)
- Oct 28, 2024 — Google expands AI Overviews to 100+ countries; begins surfacing more in‑line links. (blog.google)
- Oct–Dec 2024 — OpenAI moves SearchGPT features into ChatGPT, with staged availability to Plus/Teams and then wider release. (openai.com)
- Feb 14–15, 2025 — Perplexity launches Deep Research (free tier with limits), highlighting iterative retrieval and citations. (perplexity.ai)
- 2025 — Studies show AI chatbots still trail traditional search in total traffic, but are growing quickly—evidence of a transitional year rather than a full handover. (indianexpress.com)
The upshot: users are training themselves to read AI summaries with citations; engines are training themselves to reward pages that are easy to cite. That’s GEO in one line.
—
How AI search assembles answers today: Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT Search, and Perplexity
All three leading experiences follow a similar pattern:
1) Retrieve likely sources
2) Read, segment, and normalize content (entities, claims, dates)
3) Write a consolidated answer with citations
4) Offer paths to “drill down” (follow‑ups, filters, shopping, maps)
Where they differ is in defaults, disclosure, and depth.
- Google AI Overviews: defaults on for many informational queries. It increasingly places links inside the AI text and in a right‑rail cluster on desktop. Google’s messaging emphasizes that AI Overviews help discovery rather than suppress clicks, and that over time it is adding more visible source links inside the narrative. For GEO, this means the exact sentence a model writes matters—if your fact is the one being quoted, your domain appears. (blog.google)
- ChatGPT Search: integrated directly into ChatGPT. It decides when to search and shows linked sources, with periodic product updates (for example, improved long‑context reasoning and multi‑search behavior in mid‑2025). OpenAI positions search as a way to “go straight to the source” and is actively partnering with publishers. For content teams, that means track which of your pages ChatGPT cites and how often—this is your GEO baseline. (openai.com)
- Perplexity: answer‑first with prominent citations, plus a Deep Research mode that runs dozens of automated lookups and compiles a shareable report. It has also struck direct partnerships with major publishers, which influences licensing and presentation. If your market is news‑sensitive, watch these partnerships because they may determine who gets cited for certain verticals. (perplexity.ai)
Traffic is still mixed. One study comparing March 2025 visits found AI chatbots at just under 3% of search engine traffic—small, but rising fast year over year. That’s precisely why GEO is a hedge: you maintain classic SEO while actively competing for citations in AI answers that already reach hundreds of millions of users. (indianexpress.com)
Two more operational realities affect publishers:
- Opt‑outs for training are imperfect. “Google‑Extended” in robots.txt can limit use of your content for model improvement (e.g., Bard/Gemini/Vertex AI training), but it does not block inclusion in AI Overviews because those are considered part of Search. To block Overviews, you’d have to block Googlebot more broadly—an impractical trade‑off for most sites. (mediapost.com)
- Legal and policy pressure keeps rising. News organizations continue to test the boundaries of fair use and licensing with AI companies. While this article isn’t legal advice, it’s smart to monitor publisher partnerships and lawsuits because they shape what engines are willing to cite and how they attribute. (axios.com)
—
GEO playbook: tactics to earn citations and visibility in generative engines
GEO isn’t a wholesale replacement for SEO. It’s a layer on top: everything that helps a search engine parse, verify, and quote your page. You’re optimizing for three audiences at once—humans, crawlers, and models that compose answers.
Structure for machine comprehension: citations, schemas, and freshness signals
Content the engines love to cite usually has four things:
- Unambiguous claims with sources
- Clean page structure that exposes entities, measures, and steps
- Structured data mapping those entities to recognized schema
- Strong freshness and versioning signals (updated on, change logs, dated tables)
Practical steps:
- Write quotable claims. When you assert a number, date, or definition, cite it in‑line and make the sentence stand on its own. Keep the subject clear: “On Oct 28, 2024, Google expanded AI Overviews to 100+ countries” paired with an official source link is far easier for models to lift and cite than a buried clause three paragraphs down. (blog.google)
- Use JSON‑LD consistently. There’s no “AI Overviews schema,” but the 2024–2025 guidance from Google and industry experts remains: use valid JSON‑LD, align markup with visible content, and avoid spammy or mismatched types. In our tests with customers, consistent @id, Organization, Article, HowTo, FAQ (where it genuinely helps), and Product markup improves machine understanding and reduces misattribution. (quickcreator.io)
- Expose freshness. Add “Updated on” with ISO dates, changelogs, and version numbers. Time‑sensitive topics get cited more reliably when the model can resolve “which source is most current.” Emerging audits like GEO‑16 (2025) also find Freshness, Metadata, and Structured Data pillars correlate with higher citation likelihood. (arxiv.org)
- Clarify entities. Disambiguate brand names, people, and products with consistent names, sameAs links, and internal entity pages. Ambiguity is the enemy of citation.
- Control what engines can use. If your policy is to allow search indexing but block model training, implement Google‑Extended and GPTBot directives in robots.txt. Know the trade‑offs: this won’t stop AI Overviews from quoting, and it won’t remove past training exposure, but it can align your policy stance and reduce future training use. (mediapost.com)
Quality signals that help models “trust” a page include:
- Semantic HTML (proper headings, lists, figure captions)
- On‑page citations to primary sources
- Clear author and revision metadata
- Consistent terminology across related pages
- Unique insights (original data, methodologies)
Those are classic content hygiene items—GEO just makes them non‑negotiable.
Earned media and engine‑specific tuning across Gemini, ChatGPT, and Perplexity
The engines do not weigh all signals equally. A few engine‑tuned habits help:
- For Google AI Overviews (Gemini in Search):
- Consolidate definitive resources. Create canonical “answers pages” with short, quotable definitions and then deeper sections below.
- Use schema for the page’s primary entity and make sure titles, H1s, and the first two paragraphs answer the query cleanly.
- Track how your page appears in AI Overviews, not only classic rankings. Screenshot and log the exact snippets that include your domain. Google’s recent updates increase in‑line linking—make those first two sentences irresistible for the model to quote. (blog.google)
- For ChatGPT Search:
- Assume multi‑hop retrieval. ChatGPT often runs multiple searches and builds a longer, reasoned answer. Pages that summarize and then cite primary data (with dates) tend to be favored.
- Monitor ChatGPT’s release notes for changes in search depth and connectors; in mid‑2025, OpenAI improved multi‑search and long‑context handling, which correlates with deeper source sets on complex questions. (help.openai.com)
- If you publish shopping or product guides, ensure structured metadata, spec tables, and current pricing where possible—OpenAI called out shopping features that surface images, reviews, and direct links without ads. (reuters.com)
- For Perplexity (including Deep Research):
- Think “research brief.” Perplexity’s Deep Research compiles longer outputs with lots of citations; pages that offer authoritative overviews with clear sectioning and data tables often end up cited.
- Watch publisher partnerships—news outlets like Le Monde have public agreements shaping how content is used and credited. If your vertical overlaps, engage early. (perplexity.ai)
A note on traffic expectations: AI chatbots and answer engines still send far less aggregate traffic than traditional search, but they’re moving up fast and already influence brand authority. Treat GEO as additive: win citations now, so as usage grows, you’re the site users see and click. (indianexpress.com)
—
Measuring GEO: coverage, citation share, freshness, and compliance
If GEO is the strategy, measurement is the moat. We recommend a lightweight but disciplined scoreboard:
- Coverage: For a defined query set, in how many AI answers do you appear at all? Track by engine (AI Overviews, ChatGPT Search, Perplexity). Use periodic, scripted checks with screenshots.
- Citation share: Among all cited domains for a query, what’s your share of citations and how often are you in the first paragraph? A single in‑line link at the top of the answer is worth more than a footnote link in the last section.
- Freshness delta: For time‑sensitive topics, measure the age of your last update vs. the top cited competitor. Aim to be “most recent credible source.”
- Snippet clarity: Does the engine quote your wording or paraphrase you? If it’s quoting a competitor’s cleaner, shorter definition, refactor your opening sentences.
- Policy compliance and risk: Track your robots.txt stances (Google‑Extended, GPTBot, Common Crawl) and log policy changes. Understand that blocking Google‑Extended does not block AI Overviews; only blocking Googlebot would, which typically isn’t acceptable. Document your trade‑offs and legal posture. (searchengineland.com)
- Cross‑engine contrasts: Expect differences. Independent audits suggest that structured data, semantic HTML, and explicit freshness correlate with higher citation likelihood—especially for product and B2B queries. Create a per‑engine dashboard and don’t assume wins in one carry over automatically. (arxiv.org)
A practical cadence:
- Monthly: Citation share and coverage refresh for your priority keywords
- Quarterly: Structured data QA and entity review (sameAs links, @id consistency)
- Ad hoc: Content refactors when you lose the top‑of‑answer citation to a competitor
Remember that GEO is probabilistic. You’re improving odds, not guaranteeing inclusion. That’s why consistent measurement is the only way to see movement.
—
Operationalizing GEO at scale: how Airticler’s GEO‑optimized content and article generation help
At Airticler, we build for this reality: your content has to satisfy people, classic search, and generative engines simultaneously—without adding headcount or manual drudgery.
Here’s how teams use Airticler to operationalize GEO alongside traditional SEO:
- Website Scan and brand learning: We scan your site to learn your voice, audiences, and knowledge assets. That context is injected into generation so your definitions, product explanations, and data points are consistent across pages—an advantage when models look for canonical phrasing to cite.
- Compose with goal and audience targeting: You select keywords and GEO targets (queries and engines), and Airticler drafts articles that lead with quotable, source‑backed claims. We front‑load definitive sentences and clean entity names so they’re easy for engines to lift and attribute correctly.
- On‑page SEO autopilot: Titles, meta, internal links, external citations, and semantic HTML are handled in one pass. Our structured data layer (JSON‑LD) maps Organization, Article, Product, FAQ/HowTo (when genuinely valuable), and entity references. This alignment with visible content is designed to meet Google Search Central guidance and avoid schema drift that hurts AI parsing. (quickcreator.io)
- Fact‑checking and plagiarism controls: We verify claims and dates against primary sources during drafting. That reduces the risk of being quoted with an error—a fast way to lose citation trust.
- Freshness automation: For topics where currency matters, Airticler sets review cadences and “Updated on” markers, and can regenerate sections with the latest facts. That strengthens your freshness signal, which empirical studies tie to higher citation odds. (arxiv.org)
- Images and backlinks on autopilot: We add compliant images and initiate outreach for credible backlinks, reinforcing the authority signals engines check when choosing which page to cite.
- 1‑click publishing to any CMS: WordPress, Webflow, and custom CMS are supported, with formatting and metadata preserved. That matters because schema or HTML broken at publish time can silently erase your GEO gains.
Our customers aim for outcomes, not theory. The platform’s built‑in SEO Content Score, site‑scan onboarding, and reported lifts in organic traffic, CTR, and backlinks are there to help teams see progress without micro‑managing every field. And because GEO is moving fast, we keep capabilities current—e.g., tracking how Google’s AI Overviews adjust link placement, how ChatGPT Search expands multi‑search behaviors, and how Perplexity’s Deep Research cites. (blog.google)
A sample, step‑by‑step GEO rollout with Airticler:
1) Define a GEO keyword set: 50–200 high‑impact queries that already fit your products or expertise.
2) Generate or refactor definitive resources: lead with a clean, citable answer; add source links and schema.
3) Publish with internal links to consolidate authority; add unique data or frameworks where you can.
4) Monitor AI answers monthly. If you’re cited but low on the page, tighten opening claims; if you’re missing, compare freshness and clarity vs. cited competitors.
5) Use Airticler’s regenerate‑with‑feedback to iterate quickly—then republish in one click.
Will GEO replace SEO? Not entirely. But in 2025, it’s the missing layer if you’re wondering why your well‑ranked guide isn’t the one engines are quoting. Teams that adapt—clear claims, strong structure, verified sources, steady freshness—earn more citations across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT Search, and Perplexity. Teams that don’t will watch competitors’ sentences appear above theirs.
If you’re ready to stress‑test your content for generative engines, Airticler can help you write less but rank—and get cited—more, with human‑sounding, brand‑aligned articles that publish themselves and keep schema, links, and facts in order. That’s what GEO‑optimized content means in practice, and why it’s reshaping search in 2025. (quickcreator.io)
—
References and further reading
- GEO: Generative Engine Optimization (arXiv). (arxiv.org)
- Google AI Overviews expansion and linking behavior. (blog.google)
- OpenAI: Introducing ChatGPT Search; search updates and release notes. (openai.com)
- Perplexity Deep Research announcement; publisher partnerships. (perplexity.ai)
- Training opt‑outs and SGE behaviors (Google‑Extended vs. Search). (mediapost.com)
- Market usage context for AI chat vs. classic search. (indianexpress.com)